The bordermarkers of Moresnet

Moresnet was a tiny neutral state that existed from 1815 until 1919. This triangle-shaped mini-state was connected in the north to the current BEDENL-tripoint and was some 3 square km large. It was demarcated by 60 bordermarkers.

(website by Eef Berns, created in 2022, part of www.grenspalen.nl, contact: eefberns@grenspalen.nl)


The only reason of existence of Moresnet was the local zinc mine, desired by both the Netherlands and Prussia after the fall of Napoleon. Declaring the area neutral was a compromise and was laid down in the Aachen border agreement. Often referred to it as a neutral state ('Neutral Moresnet'), it might be better described as a condominium.

The border situation changed when Belgium left the Kingdom of the Netherlands in 1839 and thus became the eastern neighbour of Neutral Moresnet. But that didn't change the status of Moresnet.
After WWI, Neutral-Moresnet was incorporated in Belgium.


Photo-gallery of the bordermarkers:
Scroll down or go directly to it


Searching the bordermarkers
Most of them still exist and were surveyed
- in 2001-2002 in several trips together with Jannis Deeleman and for a part Wil Nous, summarized in this website
- on 21-3-2004 together with Jannis Deeleman and 5 other men
- on 17-12-2021 together with Jannis Deeleman
- on 29-12-2021 with Antonia
- on 8-3-2022 with Geert Krijnen




Description of the Moresnet-borderline
The triangular shape of Neutral Moresnet was described by the Traité d'Aix-la-Chapelle (1816) in the articles 15-17 (see full text). It's not an easy French to read but we can destillate the three borderlines of the triangle of Neutral Moresnet: the base is the Liège-Aachen-road (the road itself included) and from there two straight lines go north and converge at the bedenl-tripoint.
The borderline has been reconstructed in this kml-file (Google Earth) and this gpx-file. See it online on this map.

Three remarks:
1. the western borderline has been drawn following the current municipal borderline on the maps which passes through the current 'in situ' bordermarkers 1 to the bedenl-tripoint. However: that is NOT a completely straight line! It is an almost straight line but slightly curved to the east. I know another example of such a case along the dutch-belgian borderline between bordermarker 196 and 197. It should be a straight line but new measurements in 1957 revealed that the 5 intermediate submarkers were in fact placed on a slightly curved line to the east. As if the same deviation had crept into the original measurements. See this page (in dutch).
2. the eastern straight line from the bedenl-tripoint to no. 1 is much more in accordance with the actual positions of the bordermarkers. A few minor adjustments have been made to get most of the markers on that line.
3. the southern line is drawn along the southern edge of the current course of the Lütticherstrasse between no. 1 and no. 60. One may assume that in the 19th century that street was a bit narrower.

A quadripoint from 1839 to 1919
When Belgium split from the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Moresnet became part of a quadripoint: 4 different countries meeting each other at one point, quite unique at that time and at present they don't exist anymore in the world. This is a picture of the bedenl-tripoint with the sharp northern Moresnet-point added as implemented in the pavement en with information boards.


(click picture to enlarge)

However, this is a wrong depiction as I discovered at 8-3-2022. The next picture shows the correct situation:

050-IMG_8322-vs02-with-both-indications.jpg
(click picture to enlarge)

What is left of the Moresnet borderlines?
The western borderline is nowadays a municipal borderline between Plombières and Kelmis AND the language-border between the French-speaking and German-speaking communities of Belgium. The eastern borderline has at present no function anymore, neither has the southern line.

Moresnet-bordermarkers installed
n 1818 the first (wooden) bordermarkers were placed. In its numbering it continued the row which already existed along the German border starting in Luxembourg. Bordermarker 188 was placed double in the southwest corner, bordermarker 193 on the present BEDENL-tripoint. Along the eastern border an identical row was placed with the same numbers. This is the appended map to the Traité of 1816 which shows them:


(Click map for an enlargement)

In 1869-1870 the vulnerable wooden bordermarkers were replaced by 60 stone markers: in 1869 the eastern border and in 1870 the western border. The numbering was done in roman ciphers: bordermarkers I-XXX along the western border, bordermarkers XXXI-LX along the eastern border. The northern point remained bordermarker 193. The roman numbering on the markers is however unusually (though not unusual in clockworks): 4 became IIII and not IV, 9 became VIIII and 40 becomes XXXX.
So far, I haven't found an original map or description of the exact original locations.


The bordermarkers themselves
Information provided by Michael Stein
: width 30x30cm, the pyramide-top 3cm high, height 60cm above ground-level . The number was in principle engraved at the side of the neighbouring country but some of the markers have been turned in the course of time, for example after being uprooted and reinstalled by forestry activities. It is yet unknown what the source is of Michael for this information.
In this article we read that the markers were made by one Franz Schoenauen. Each marker weighs about 200 kilo, is 110-120cm high and is 50-65cm under the ground.

This picture shows a marker in its totality (no.38 in 2004)
(Click on picture for an enlargement):


Maintenance of the markers
Of the 60 markers, there are still 50 markers 'in situ' (spring 2022). The nos. 3 and 53 are placed elsewhere. No. 50 has disappeared in recent years but will be remade and replaced. That leaves 7 markers (16, 20, 31, 52, 54-56) which are lost without any effort known to replace them in the future.
It is still amazing how many markers survived because they lost their function in 1919 and they don't have a protected status as a heritage-monument.
Anyway, there is definitely a kind of tradition of maintenance cq preservation of the markers. In 2004 there were three markers uprooted, all neatly reinstalled in 2021. We also see markers which are new ones, having replaced old markers for whatever reason.
In this article several cases of replacement, maintenance, restoration etcetera are described. The municipality of Kelmis was involved in most of these cases.

Coordinates
- all coordinates are in this kml-file (Google Earth)  and this gpx-file
(note: initially based on a gpx by Boudewijn Palthe a
nd improved with my own gps-measurements and corrections using maps, Google Earth and other information. Some of the locations of the missing markers are estimated positions and thus hypothetical)
- see them online (including the borderline) on this map

Maps to download
- Moresnet-map with borderline and bordermarkers, projected on an actual OpenTopoMap-base (1450x3650px)
- Moresnet-map with borderline and bordermarkers, projected on an actual 4UMaps-base (1500x3800px) with lots of walking trails indicated

Maps online
- topotijdreis.nl shows Moresnet on dutch maps from the 19th century onwards. However no bordermarkers shown
- Opentopo.nl is a great dutch mapping project using only open source data, use the ArcGIS-option for the online mapviewer. The maps extends a bit into Belgium showing also the Moresnet-area. However: no bordermarkers shown
- historic.places shows the first generation of the Moresnet-bordermarkersmarkers as well as the second one, projected on several historic mapbases
- topoviewer IGN Belgium: actual digital map with a lot of bordermarkers shown if you zoom-in, however no information indicated like the numbers.
- Cartesius shows Belgian historic maps on which the Moresnet-area is included after WWI when Moresnet became part of Belgium.

Sources / additional information

- Almost everything about Neutraal-Moresnet could be found in the past on the discontinued website www.moresnet.nl of Cees Damen. On the Internet Archive a partial copy can still be seen.
- Wikipedia: english article. You might also check the French and German versions because they are not identical
- Michael Stein (chairman of the museumsociety of the Museum Vieille Montagne) who kindly provided additional information, he also organises walking tours in Moresnet).
- Museum Vieille Montagne (Lütticher Straße – Route de Liège 278, B-4720 Kelmis – La Calamine). Fine museum abou the history of Moresnet. Céline Ruess - director of the museum - wrote me in 2022 that the bordermarkers do not enjoy a protected status as a cultural heritage and that they don't keep a photographical documentation of them. But they do have the bordermarker 53 on exhibition and perhaps still in their collection a part of marker 16.
- Grenzbezeichnung des Neutralen Gebietes van Moresnets - Franz-Xaver Schultheis (2 articles published in Im Göhltal, nos. 28 und 29 (february and august 1981) -> a very detailed article about the demarcation of Neutral-Moresnet but primarly focussing on the wooden predecessors of the current stone markers.
- Grenzsteinwanderung um Neutral-Moresnet -Peter Kurnap & Dieter Pitz (2 articles published in Im Göhltal, nos. 83 and 84 (2008/2009) with a detailed description of a walk along the bordermarkers
 - leaflet of a walking route along the Moresnet-border using numbered walking hubs. As a hardcopy free available at the Tourist Office in Kelmis.

Other photo-reports of the Moresnet-bordermarkers
- Peter Dirven (2004)
- Aafko Tuin  (2011)
- Frans Meeus
(2011)
- Marc van der Steen (2021) - note: large pdf - 41mb

- Boudewijn Palthe (2021)
- Jannis Deeleman (2021)


Photo-gallery of the bordermarkers - current situation (spring 2022)

No. Picture
Information







1

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)



Probably this marker stood originally on the south-side of the Lütticherstrasse, like no. 60. The Lütticherstrasse was part of Neutral-Moresnet.


2

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


Behind a house (Rue Hof 48, La Calamine) on private property. The westside is damaged and the number no longer recognizable.


3

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

Removed from its original spot in 2013. In fact it stood ± 2 meters from the road in the field and in 2009  (according to this article) it was recently replaced a few meters for whatever reason.



Photo taken in 2004

Information of Michael Stein: in 2013 removed because of construction plans which were later abandoned. Relocated in 2019  behind the townhall in Kelmis.



(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


Replaced in 2019 to a garden behind the Kelmis-townhall (Kirchstrasse 31) in a freely accessible courtyard.



4

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


Adress: in the backgarden of Rue Bruyère 50A, La Calamine


5

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


6

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)





7

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


8

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


9

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

The marker is damaged and the number is no longer recognizable.


10

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


This is obviously a new borderstone with its flat upper surface and two raw sides at the back. Already present in ± 2000.




11

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


Adress: Moresneterstraße 127, Bleyberg


12

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

This article says that the number is hidden beneath the metal H-shield.


13

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


14

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


15

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


16
(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


Disappeared.

The red-white pole is at the approximate original spot








Waypoint derived from the Belgian topographic map of 1981





But Michael Stein shows a position on a map, a bit more to the south: just before a path - which comes from the south - joins the Moresnet-borderline


A piece is (was?) kept in the museum. It was on exhibition in the former building of the museum.

This article (2009) tells that it was found by a passer-by years earlier.


17

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


18

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


19

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


20

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


Disappeared

The red-white pole is at the approximate original spot (waypoint derived from Belgian topographic maps).

However, according to information of Michael Stein, the original spot was a bit further along the dirtroad, left from where the narrow trail goes uphill.



No. 20 on the Belgian topographic map from 1981


21

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


22

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

This article from 2009 tells that it was lying flat for already long time.Thus reerected afterwards.



23

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


24

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


25

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


26

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


27

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


28

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


29

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


30

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


TP
050-IMG_8322-vs02-with-both-indications.jpg
(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

The northern tip of Moresnet at the bedenl-tripoint. It is wrongly indicated in the pavement and by an information-panel. See this page for information.


31

Photo taken on 29-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


Disappeared






Still in situ in 2004 but missing in 2008, it is assumed that it was removed because of the asphalting of the parking or is now underneath the tarmac (information Peter Dirven).

But was this really no. 31? At that time no number spotted and the dimensions not measerured. However there is some affirming information by Franz-Zaver Schultheis in 1981, cited in this article: "In contrast to the western border, the eastern border is clearly visible almost entirely in the forest. From the top, it forms only a footpath in the first part, where stone 31 stands. Dan begins a aisle that reaches as far as the Moresneter Bittweg."

That means that no. 31 was placed at some distance from the bedenl-tripoint, just before the trail/path starts in the forest towards no. 32 and further.

Moreover: it is on the approximate eastern borderline of Neutral-Moresnet.


32

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


33

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


34

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


35

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


36

Photo taken on 29-12-2021. More pictures on that page.

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

This article tells that in 2009 this marker was broken in half. But afterwards repaired as we see.



37
(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

This article tells that in 2009 this marker was knocked over. But afterwards reerected as we see.


38

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

This article tells that this marker was fixed in a concrete foundation but the marker turned in the sense that the number is now directed to the north in stead of to the east.



39

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

This article tells that this marker was fixed in a concrete foundation but the marker turned in the sense that the number is now directed to the south in stead of to the east.


40

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


41

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

42

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

43

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

44

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

45

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

46

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

47
(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

48

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

This article tells that the original marker was destroyed by forestry activities and replaced by this new one in 2000, financed by insurance money.

49

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

This article tells that the original marker was destroyed by forestry activities and replaced by this new one in 2000, financed by insurance money.

50

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


Disappeared, according to information of Michael Stein a new marker will be made and officially reinstalled in the near future.


Last known picture from 2011 by Frans Meeus

This article tells that it was ± 10 meters from the forestroad.

51

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)

52
to
57

In the next stretch of the borderline, several bordermarkers have disappeared (but no. 53 is now in the Museum Vieille Montagne).

Concerning the nos.53 and 54, one can see on this Belgian NGI Ortho air map from 1995 that they were probably removed because of the access roads to the sand quarry, still in use at time. The only marker still present in this range is no. 57.



52

Disappeared, considered as being lost

The position is not shown on the Belgian topographic maps and an hypothetical estimation was made at half the distance between no. 51 and 53.

A picture of the original spot was made on 8-3-2022.

53

Removed somewhere between 1981 and 2000 and replaced in the Museum Vieille Montagne in Kelmis.

In 1981 still 'in situ' according to Franz-Xaver Schultheis in this article.

Original position established with the Belgian topographic map of 1981 which shows it still.


(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


No. 53 in the Museum Vieille Montagne in Kelmis.



54

Disappeared, considered as being lost

The position is not shown on the Belgian topographic maps and an hypothetical estimation was made at half the distance between no. 53 and 55.

A picture of the original spot was made on 8-3-2022.

55
Disappeared, considered as being lost

In 1981 still 'in situ' according to Franz-Xaver Schultheis in this article.

Original position established with the Belgian topographic map of 1981 which shows it still.

This article tells that no. 55 was removed during sand quarry activities and put aside at the edge of the quarry. That's all we know of the fate of no. 53.

A picture of the original spot was made on 8-3-2022.

56

Disappeared, considered as being lost

The position is not shown on the Belgian topographic maps and an hypothetical estimation of it was made at half the distance between no. 55 and 57.

A picture of the original spot was made on 8-3-2022.

57


(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


Adress: Käskorb 17, La Calamine


No. 57 in 2004

Information of Michael Stein: in earlier times, this marker stood behind the house.

However, the eastern borderline passes at this spot (the edge of the house). So this seems the most correct position.


58

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


Adress: Hattich 6, La Calamine)

59

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


Adress: opposite of Brunnenstraße 33, Kelmis

60

(Photo taken on 17-12-2021. More pictures on that page)

(click picture to enlarge, click browser go-back-arrow to return)


Adress: Lütticherstraße 119, Kelmis